Skip to main content

Budget 2026-27 - Did I really get nothing from the budget?

When a government stays in power for too long, one characteristic becomes very prominent and it is consistency in vision. For this government, that common vision seems to be Viksit Bharat, which simply translates to Developed India.

You can’t just keep building new highways while the current roads are full of potholes. Real progress means fixing today’s roads and planning tomorrow’s routes. That’s exactly what the government is trying to do by increasing capital expenditure from ₹2 lakh crore in 2014–15 to ₹12.2 lakh crore today, while simultaneously pushing reforms across multiple fronts.

In line with this approach, the Union Budget 2026-27 once again signals that whether private capital expenditure rises or not, government capex will continue to increase. Reforms will also continue. New focus areas whether sector-wise or region-wise will be added, keeping both growth (~7% of GDP) and fiscal prudence (4.4% of GDP) in mind.

I know it feels like “I got nothing from this budget,” mainly because there were no major changes in direct or indirect taxes for the common man. But let’s pause and ask, “did we really get nothing at all?”. In my opinion, this budget is primarily future-focused, in terms of skill development for coming generations, opening newer avenues for employment generation and technology enablement for legacy industries.

This year, while the government capex had the traditional spending like roads, highways, waterways, railways, defence, etc but it also had a significant portion towards social infrastructure, especially within the services sector. One of the most important statements in the budget speech was the announcement of a High-Powered “Education to Employment and Enterprise” Standing Committee to focus on the Services Sector as a core driver of Viksit Bharat. The Finance Minister also stated that India aims to capture 10% of the world’s services output in the coming years. This marks a clear structural shift, with India aiming to be indispensable to the world.

It almost feels as if the government wants to open up newer engines of growth like tourism, medical tourism, education, AYUSH, AI, and data centres.

I would like to draw your attention to the sheer number of initiatives announced to strengthen the services ecosystem.

  • Upgrading and establishing new institutions for Allied Health Professionals (AHPs) across ten disciplines.
  • Developing NSQF-aligned programmes to train 1.5 lakh multi-skilled caregivers.
  • Supporting states to establish five hubs for Medical Value Tourism in partnership with the private sector.
  • Setting up three new All India Institutes of Ayurveda, upgrading AYUSH pharmacies and drug testing labs, and strengthening the WHO Global Traditional Medicine Centre.
  • Establishing AVGC Content Creator Labs in 15,000 secondary schools and 500 colleges.
  • Setting up a new National Institute of Design through the Challenge route in eastern India.
  • Developing five University Townships near major industrial and logistics corridors.
  • Building girls’ hostels in higher education STEM institutions in every district.
  • Setting up or upgrading four Telescope Infrastructure facilities.
  • Creating a National Institute of Hospitality to bridge academia, industry and government.
  • Launching a pilot scheme to upskill 10,000 tourist guides across 20 iconic destinations.
  • Creating a National Destination Digital Knowledge Grid to digitally document places of significance.
  • Developing ecologically sustainable mountain trails, turtle trails and bird-watching trails.
  • Hosting India’s first Global Big Cat Summit.
  • Developing 15 archaeological sites into vibrant experiential cultural destinations.
  • Expanding Buddhist circuits in the North-East region.

So, if the budget was actually this comprehensive, why didn’t it feel good?

Because while the government looks at the macro picture, we as individuals and even securities markets collectively focus on a single question: “What’s in it for me?”. At the end of the day, human behaviour is instinctive and driven by immediate personal impact.

For individuals, the benefits of this budget are indirect but real. Their children will gain from initiatives like university townships, content creator labs, new Ayurveda institutes, and education-linked infrastructure. Instead of repeatedly asking the government to reduce our tax burden, maybe this budget is subtly answering a different question - how the taxes we already pay can shape our country, businesses, and future generations.

Now coming to the market reaction, why did markets respond so negatively? Mainly due to two announcements.

First, the increase in STT on futures from 0.02% to 0.05%, and on options premium and option exercise from 0.10% and 0.125% to 0.15% each. The government’s stated intent is to discourage excessive options trading and promote long-term investing. But what often gets overlooked is that trader behaviour isn’t driven by potential losses rather it changes only after real losses occur. In reality, many traders may simply exit positions faster, not because STT rose, but because capital erosion happened quicker.

The second factor impacting banking stocks was the increase in gross borrowing to ₹17.2 lakh crore (almost 18% increase from last year). Someone has to fund the government’s ambitious capex plans. Taxation didn't increase (Thank God!), so it comes from market borrowing. The pool of borrowable money is the same for everyone, whether it is for the government, banks or corporates. When government borrowing rises, available funds for others shrink, putting pressure on interest rates and liquidity.

Overall, this budget feels like the second week of starting a new fitness routine. You feel sore, tired and uncomfortable, without seeing visible results yet. But it is the consistency that eventually reshapes the body. In the same way, this budget isn’t designed to deliver instant gratification, it is designed to shape a stronger India over time.

 

Comments

  1. This is a good comprehensive analysis. Seems like the focus is on long term orientation rather than short focus or SOP's.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes indeed and that's why it feels inadequate but it's moving in the right direction.

      Delete
  2. Psu banks restructuring would happen for which committee will be constituted.

    Excellent analysis.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes indeed. It was clarified in the press conference.

      Delete
  3. Comprehensive analysis explained in simple words. Thank you

    ReplyDelete
  4. Comprehensive analysis explained in simple words

    ReplyDelete
  5. It may be correct,looks like defending the budget,does it any new direction for corporates?
    What is defences it gives when solid country US is taking steps against indiawill FTA alone can help?Sitaraman budget will always support industry growth but this time it is missing..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your view. My intent isn’t to defend the budget but to interpret its direction. This year’s focus is less on short term corporate incentives and more on building long-term capacity through services sector expansion, skills infrastructure, tourism, healthcare education, AVGC and logistics-linked education hubs. These don’t create instant market excitement but shape future hiring, exports and scalability.
      On geopolitics, budgets cannot directly counter US trade actions. That happens through diplomacy and trade policy. What the budget can do is reduce dependency by strengthening domestic demand and diversifying export engines, which is exactly where the spending emphasis lies. Industry support hasn’t disappeared, it has shifted from direct incentives to ecosystem building, which is slower but structurally stronger.

      Delete
  6. A good and comprehensive analysis of the budget as it aligns to the vikshit Bharat plans 👍🏼

    ReplyDelete
  7. Insightful analysis and well written.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2021- Damned if you do, damned if you don't

Every time an Indian finance minister presents the budget, you will hear murmurs of "mujhe kya mila?" and "humare liye kya hai?" across the sections of the society. Even those getting the biggest pie that year would often feel the allocation is inadequate. Such is the need of a growing economy like ours. At the end of the budget speech, several "gurus" of economics and finance will put on their thinking caps and give their verdict: whether the budget was socialist or capitalistic? i.e. whether it benefits the poor and middle class more or the business class. Today's splendid rally in the market (5% for Nifty) gave its own verdict that in true sense the market makers believe the budget is for the greater good for the revival of Indian Economy and specifically for the Equity markets.  So, what happened in the budget? The words, the tone and most importantly the numbers showed that the government is keen on getting the economy back on track and through th...

Conservative asset classes- Cash & Gold

Cash, which had become a forgotten asset class, is regaining its importance since the beginning of the Coronavirus pandemic. The current health crisis is bringing up questions about the need for having emergency funds and liquidity funds. Typically, personal finance specialists advise three months of your fixed expenses (such as rent, food, travel, EMIs, etc.) to be kept as emergency fund and additional three months of fixed expenses as liquidity fund . However, if we look at the current scenario where the health insurances are not covering some of the expenses incurred during the COVID-19 treatment and there is severe job crisis in major parts of the world, keeping only six months of cash reserve doesn’t seem to be adequate. Having said this, hoarding cash is not appropriate as well. Reserve banks across major economies have slashed interest rates severely in the past six months, which means you wouldn’t earn anything if you keep all your money in the banks. Currently, established com...